"Jim Fisher" wrote in message
. ..
"gatt" wrote in message
The discussion is, is the aviation community's drug and alcohol
habit--or
lack thereof--influenced by drug testing policy; do pilots obstain
because
of drug tests, or do they obstain because they're pilots?

I personally think drug testing throughout all areas of transportation is
a
Very Good Idea.

Back in my younger years, I quit smoking pot because I got a job that did
random drug testing. That's good for y'all 'cause I was in charge of
remotely controlling the flows and pressures for thousands of miles of
very
high pressure natural gas pipeline. It would not be good if I forgot to
open or shut a valve when I was supposed to do so.

I didn't smoke pot while flying because that would be stupid.

I don't smoke pot now because my short term memory is bad enough as it is.

Testing kits aren't "prohibitively expensive" as your buddy says.
Twenty-five people can be tested for about $250.00. That may be
"expensive"
depending on how many you must do but I would not put it in the
"prohibitively expensive" category.

Either way, the cost of NOT doing pre, post and interim drug screening
would
be much higher than I'm willing to pay. Too damn many people are like I
used to be.

--
Jim Fisher



And then there are the people that have a lifetime supply by prescription of
vicodan, percodan, percocet, diazapam, or some other opiate, hypnotic or
designer pansy pill that have very bad effect on a persons judgment and
decision making skills than cannabis and leaves them highly susceptible to
suggestion. I would trust the guy that drinks & smokes cannabis at home then
work with someone on them make you feel happy pansy pills that they had out
like candy.