Since the pilot would be liable for the accident, KFI (or their insurers)
would sue the pilot to recover damages.

It shouldn't affect KFI's insurance premiums at all.

Think of it in terms of someone who drives a car into your house. Even if
your homeowner's insurance initially paid, they would attempt to recoup
damages from the driver of the car.




"Larry Dighera" wrote in message
...
On Tue, 21 Dec 2004 20:04:08 GMT, "Steven P. McNicoll"
wrote in
. net::


"JohnMcGrew" wrote in message
...

The FUL pilots association has been bugging KFI for years to install
multi-level strobes on it, like many other large towers in flat areas.
KFI
always insisted that with the existing red light on top, the tower was
legal,
and installing new strobes would be too expensive. (but certainly not
as
expensive as a new tower will be)


Strobes would have been a direct expense, wouldn't the tower likely be
insured?


True, but do you think the insurance claim may have an effect on the
future premium?