"Steven P. McNicoll" wrote in message
link.net...

"Andrew Rowley" wrote in message
...

While I am not generally in favor of the way the US judicial system
seems to encourage people to sue, I don't see this particular
principle as a problem. If you can remove responsibility by meeting
regulations, then you need regulations to cover pretty much all
possible circumstances, and you end up with much more legislation than
you really want.

If you require some personal responsibility and common sense on top of
regulations, you can end up with similar (potentially better) results,
with greater freedom overall.


What's the purpose of the regulations regarding marking and lighting?


Regulations provide minimum requirements. Meeting minimum requirements does
not guarantee freedom from liability. Just ask any auto or aircraft
manufacturer.