"Joe Feise" wrote in message
...
The goal of the immigration law is to ensure that no American loses a job
because of an immigrant.

Again, my point is that there are examples (such as the one I've described)
where an immigrant is not causing an American to lose a job.

It doesn't matter if an immigrant wants to work for a company. The company
has to try and find a qualified American or Permanent Resident first, and
only if they don't find one, then they can try and sponsor an immigrant.
If they don't find one because they don't pay as much as others, that's
not an excuse to sponsor an immigrant.

Yes, I know all that. Did I mention that I know quite a few immigrant
workers?

Immigration Law 101.
If you don't like it, lobby Congress to change it. CIS has to apply the
law.

None of what you wrote has anything to do with what I'm talking about.

[...]
So, again, setting the followup to alt.visa.us.

And again, ignoring your idiotic urge to move this thread to somewhere else.

I have no idea why I expected any outcome from my comment other than what
happened. There's always someone, on Usenet, who feels that in spite of
having NO personal knowledge of some situation that they can comment with
any intelligence on the wherefors and wherehows of that situation. This
time it was you (and others), but it's always someone.

I think it's wonderful that there are people so optimistic (such as
yourself, Larry, etc) who feel that our government does a perfect job of
following the spirit (and even letter) of our laws. That sort of optimism
surely improves the world somehow. But it doesn't mean you are right.

Pete