"Al Denelsbeck" wrote in message
. 6...


This is the third response to this messsage. The first two have yet to
appear on the thread. The problem is probably on my end. Otherwise, they
may eventually trickle down, but I'm not waiting for that.

With respect to this garbage:

Pretty scattered behavior for someone who claims to
be pursuing some kind of 'research', and research, moreover, that nobody
would really give a damn about.


Al, you are either dyslectic, an imbecile or a liar. Most likely, you are a
combination of at least two of those. Your implication that I mentioned
"study" or claimed to be pursuing some kind of research, is a lie. You, who
on 10/25/03 posted: "Since you're offering this so comfortably, you
undoubtedly have a reputable source at hand that backs up your claims. So
trot it out. Because I'm telling you right now you're full of ****," now
have a first rate opportunity to show us how its done. The "reputable
source at hand" is right in front of you. Your task will be easy if you're
telling the truth and impossible if you're lying. Search the thread, find
the message where I mentioned study or research, repost the message here and
prove me a liar, or fail to do so and prove yourself to be a pathetic fraud
who wound up hoisted on his own petard and an ass who foolishly draws
attention to himself with bluff and bluster.

Your bluff has been called.


You amused yet?

Amused enough to withdraw 'dyslectic' from my accusation.

C'mon, try yet another tack, "Professor".


How's them for tacks?


- Al.

--
Kalijaa

domain