On Fri, 24 Sep 2004 22:03:29 GMT, Juan Jimenez wrote:

richard riley wrote in
:

:Why should we believe her over Killians own son?

And wife

Who also didn't spend every day with him at the office.

and commanding officer (Gen Hodges)

Who only confirmed that the document was not authentic, not that the
content was innacurate.

and the retired General that was supposed to be pressuring them (Staudt).

Who is refusing to comment on the matter.

There's not a single piece of evidence or testimony that Bush got
special treatment or didn't do what was required that hasn't been
completely disproved.

Wrong again. No evidence has been found that the Shrub showed up for duty
in his Alabama Guard unit in the time that has been disputed. None.


The misconception is that the military documented everything and that
those documents are perfectly preserved in an archive. It just ain't
so!

You would think an Army CID murder investigation would be well
documented. After 8 years of research the only documents I've found
are 2 civilian newspaper articles.

So the absence of documents only proves there are no documents.
Actually, it only proves that they haven't been found.

By the way, do you have anything (verifiable documents) other than
your own crowing that proves Campbell is flying around in a 727. He
could have just as easily have fallen down a well in a drunken stupor.

Same analogy.