Some recent posts indicate that I was just taking *Cheep-Shots* at
motorgliders. There has been some intense debating and some attempts at humor,
But let me say, I fully support motorgliders in US competition. I voted to
allow MG's in 18 meter, Open and Sports classes (Regionals & Nationals) This
position was clearly stated in my letter to the rules committee, that started
this thread, some hundred posters back.

My proposed rules change would force both type of competitors to make the SAME
soaring decisions. Lets say, Eric (ASH-26) and JJ (ASH-25) are over the last
turn point, some 30 miles from home. We both have about 2500 feet and its 6:00
PM. If the day isn't dead, its dying fast. What do we do? We can land at the
turn point and get distance points + 25 bonus. We can start a glide and hope we
hit a bump out there, somewhere??? If we get lucky, we both make it home. No
difference, we both get speed points. If we don't get lucky, I must pick a
field and land, I have no choice. Eric may pick a field and land also. We will
both get distance points to our field, no difference. Eric has an option, he
can start his engine and fly home. My proposal deals with how do we fairly deal
with Eric's CHOICE to start his engine. The options a

1. Eric gets distance points to engine start ( present rule)

2. Eric gets distance points to the last turn point. I don't agree , because
there is no reason for Eric to NOT try this unsuccessful glide. Get a bump and
make it home, don't get a bump, and get scored at the last turn point anyway.
Why not give it a try?

3. Eric gets ZERO points for starting his engine. It was HIS decision to
attempt the glide, He had exactly the SAME DECISION that I had. He knew the
consequences of his intended act. In my humble opinion, My proposed rule change
makes BOTH of us EXACTLY the SAME, again.
:)
JJ Sinclair