Thread
:
Why does PW-5 get no respect?
View Single Post
#
4
November 21st 03, 12:49 AM
Andreas Maurer
external usenet poster
Posts: n/a
On 20 Nov 2003 13:31:02 -0700,
(Mark James Boyd)
wrote:
I wonder what the L/D and penetration would be like
if the PW-5 AND the L-33 had retractable gear?
Would the polar look more like the Pegasus 101?
Anyone have a Pegasus 101 club (fixed gear) polar
we can look at?
Performance difference two points of max. L/D.
it seems this is from the elevator, and "taping up
the relatively large openings on both the
top and bottom surface of the elevator control attach
location, and at the base of the rudder" makes the
elevator vibration problem go away.
Also in the article take a look at
the "wing root air seals," very interesting...
I wonder how many other gliders have these
similar big air holes in the fuse-to-wing.
sarcasm on
None that was designed after 1965.
sarcasm off
It's not only the performance that makes the PW-5 hard to sell. As a
Ka-8 replacement the performance does not matter... but it were the
many sub-standard technical solutions on the (early) PW-5 that made me
(and all of my club members) laugh.
Bye
Andreas
Andreas Maurer