RobertR237 wrote:
Barnyard BOb - wrote:

On 27 Sep 2004 14:10:52 GMT, osite (RobertR237)
wrote:



The bigger issue might be when the government runs the healthcare industry,
they must also set the salaries of those in the industry. Just how many of

our

brightest and most capable future physicians would opt to the medical field

if

they know that they will be forced to work for whatever the burro-craps

decide

they should earn?

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Whatz gnu?
The HMO's are in effect setting salaries now...
and the effects are observable as we speak.

If govt takes over, I'd guess salaries and costs
would rise while quality of care heads south.

Where do I get such an opinion?
If the govt were in the beer brewing business...
a six pack would cost $25 and Uncle Sam
would still be losing money. g


Barnyard BOb --

Once a rabble rousing mal-content, always a rabble rousing mal-content
huh Bob?

Dick Steel



No Dick, he just has a brain that is working quite well. Name one, just one
thing that the government controls that is not totally ****ed up and cost 10
times what it should. Anyone who thinks that the government could run the
healthcare industry better or cheaper than the current private system doesn't
have a clue. Most of our current run-up in healthcare costs can be directly
traced to and attributed to the government and the stupidity of the medicare
system.


Bob Reed
www.kisbuild.r-a-reed-assoc.com (KIS Builders Site)
KIS Cruiser in progress...Slow but steady progress....

"Ladies and Gentlemen, take my advice,
pull down your pants and Slide on the Ice!"
(M.A.S.H. Sidney Freedman)



Well Mr. reed I'm afraid I have to agree wqith you. If they can't keep
track of 8 million pounds of explosives that are stored in sealed
bunkers or find a seven foot tall raghead in the desert I'm pretty sure
they would screw up just about anything they touch.

Dick