The category to which I was referring was (the one or two people who may
think that Lennie's posts have some value.)

And yes, I was suggesting that you do not quote Lennie because to read you I
will have to read him and that I will not do.

In addition, now that we are discussing posts, please put your response at
the front (on top) of your reply and that way
we won't have to read the previous post unless we want to. This is standard
newsgroup etiquette.

Allan

"Eric Greenwell" wrote in message
...
ADP wrote:
Eric,
Lennie's posts may have some value to you but please don't put us all in
the same category.

I'm not aware of putting you in any category, but at least tell me what
category you think I put you in: the "same one as Lennie", or in the
category of "people who think Lennie's posts may have some value"? Or
something else?

I have successfully excluded him from my allowed list and I wish that
anyone replying to Lennie not quote
his post in your reply.

You are suggesting we not quote Lennie when we reply to him? I hope that's
not what you are asking, because I always quote the person I'm replying
for the usual reasons.

--
-----
change "netto" to "net" to email me directly

Eric Greenwell
Washington State
USA