Eric Greenwell wrote:
I like the COTS idea, but I don't think this is the way to do it. I
suspect most pilots would find it easier to buy, borrow, or rent an
approved logger than to find an "approved OO"! So, be careful what you
wish for, in case you get it.
For pilots that don't operate out of large club, the approved logger is
a god send, because getting an experienced OO when you need one can be
impossible. The approved logger makes the OO's task much easier,
especially if it's used sealed to the glider.
I take your point, Eric, and it's a valid one to some extent - more so
in your country than most others I'd guess. The approved logger system
is well established though and could continue in parallel with an
"approved OO" system. I think an alternative system for badges up to
Silver/Gold would certainly be helpful at Club level. In most
countries, willing, experienced OOs are more common than expensive loggers.
Actually, as Tim's post showed, the opposition to any alternative is so
violent and resistance to different ideas is so entrenched within the
IGC establishment that I don't expect any change. I wouldn't waste too
much of my life thinking about it if I were you. I didn't. I flew my
"new" Ka6 on Saturday and had a wave flight in a DG-500 today. Great
weekend! I hope yours was as good.
Graeme Cant
|