In article , Robert Ehrlich
I can't believe that, except for very low heights. The elevator experience
you mention mention is for such heights, or at least when something (the
building itself) is very near.
The best processing system (e.g. the bird's brain) cannot infer anything
from missing or non significative input. In the case of climbing, the only
information on which you say they rely is the change in the apparent size
of ground features. I didn't do the computation, but I bet that the change
during one full turn is below the optical resolution of a bird's eye. In
this domain, we are better equiped than they are, our eyes are larger.
On the other hand, do you think you'd be able to spot a mouse from
3000ft? No problem for some birds of prey.
--
Mike Lindsay
|