!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN"
html
head
meta content="text/html;charset=ISO-8859-1" http-equiv="Content-Type"
/head
body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000"
div class="moz-text-flowed"
style="font-family: -moz-fixed; font-size: 13px;" lang="x-western"Andreas
Maurer wrote:
br
"You are correct, Ian - but here in Germany still a lot of Ka-7 and
br
ASK-13 are in use which do spin well and are commonly used for spin
br
training (not to mention other two-seaters that spin like the DG-500).
br
Yet I have not heard of a spin accident in one of them so far,
br
although their number far exceeds the number of Puchacz."
br
br
I trained on both an ASK13 and a Puchacz, and there is a real
difference between their spin characteristics. Our K13 would spin
(since re-covering it is very reluctant), recovered very quickly and
lost far less height.
br
br
The Puchacz spin entry, recovery and height loss is much more like the
single-seaters I've spun (Astir and Open Cirrus).
br
br
From what I recall of previous discussion on r.a.s., the majority of
Puchacz spin accidents were soon after its introduction and seemed
largely to be a result of unexpected height loss compared to previous
trainers - can someone who knows more about this confirm or contradict?
br
br
Chris Reed
br
br
br
br
br
/div
/body
/html