"Ron Rosenfeld" wrote in message
...
Not being a mindreader, I cannot answer your question about "why"?
No need to. It was a rhetorical question.
Nor do I know when the AWOS was installed, or how that correlates with
"manual weather observations".
The AWOS-A would be redundant and thus a waste of money as the altimeter
setting is part of a manual weather observation.
As I previously wrote, when manual observations were being done, the
frequency with which they were disseminated was perhaps one every few
weeks. This was not very useful to me for routine operations.
A preponderance of evidence indicates certified weather observations were
never taken at EPM.
|