But to answer the question, I'm sure it would be fun, but I wasn't
flying the Swift often enough to feel really comfortable doing it -
That makes sense!
and in Arizona I didn't have to take high tows (easy to thermal up to acro
height) so didn't get far enough away from the glider's owner to feel
good about it either!
I see ;-)
At risk of topic-creep, how does the Fox compare to the Swift (flying
wise; I know what it looks like)?
Hereīs what I think (others might see it different):
The Fox has some advantages in the upward lines (due to more inertia). It
rolls a little slower (more span), but not much and the stick forces on
aileron are a tad heavier. I had less problems with rolling circles in the
Fox in the beginning, donīt know how it would be now. My success rate in
stall turns/hammerheads is 100% in the Fox, whereas in the Swift I still
fu.. up ever now and then! My Swift is said to be quite straight, but some
apparently are quite tricky in negative push-upīs. The Fox however is much
easier to push up negative (talk about tailslides with negative entry, my
personal nightmare in the Swift). The Fox flicks like mad, but I had more
problems doing a nice one (stop exactly). Later Foxes are much tamer than
early model Foxes. The early model Fox I flew was good for some amazing
flicks/acclerated stalls, late models are still good, but not that
aggressive. Seating is more comfortable in the Swift but I had no problems
in the Fox either (Iīm 5ft30). The fun-factor in the Fox is unbeatable with
the possibility to take somebody up, but for doing competition style
aerobatics, Iīm quite happy with my Swift and would not change.
Thatīs my personal experience after about 50 take-offs in the Fox vs. about
350 in my Swift.
Markus
|