I consider all of your previous objections to be advantages on my part.

Quote:

"A. Aren't a pilot
B. Aren't an engineer
C. Have assembled a aircraft design team without an aeronautical
engineer
D. Don't know what it takes to build, analyze, static test, or flight
test an
aircraft.
E. Aren't familiar with the FAA rules for certifying aircraft.
F. Haven't done a shred of research on the field to know of the other
small
jets being developed by companies that HAVE all the above experience.
For
example: "

A) Pilots don't design planes, they fly them.
B)I'm not bound to the overhead of having "a career on the line". I
don't know of the accepted design boundaries. I'm not associated with
any university, corporation, or other institution that is going to
thwart any new discoveries by the process of "peer review". Engineers
out there ought to be keenly aware of these handicaps.
C)Same advatages as above.
D)I don't need to know everything. Every task will be deligated to the
most qualified. That's my accepted responsibility.
E)I am determined to prove beyond a shadow of doubt that the FAA is a
hinderance to all intellectual activity or scientific discovery. They
will not be necessary for the prototype development and would only get
in the way.
F)I wish not to be influenced by old ideas when my stated objective is
to develop "new" technology!