View Single Post
  #14  
Old March 8th 05, 01:13 PM
jsmith
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

That's exactly my point Dudley.
I am not argueing about the content of the program as it is taught.
Only that the manual by itself is not sufficient.
For that matter, it should not be called a manual at all.
My interpretation of the OP's question was a self contained manual.

Dudley Henriques wrote:
This is correct. The video and the manual were meant to be used together as
a system. The manual alone is simply a reference source. The info is there,
but to get the complete picture, you do need the video.
Dudley Henriques
International Fighter Pilots Fellowship
Commercial Pilot; CFI; Retired
dhenriquestrashatearthlinktrashdotnet
(take out the trash :-)

"jsmith" wrote in message
Okay, maybe useless is the wrong word.
Grossly inadequate is more descriptive.
The manual by itself is too basic and leaves out too much really
important information.


"Dave Stadt" wrote in message
My T-34 package included a video which is what provided most of the
information. The manual is just a reference which I do not believe was
meant to serve as a stand alone document.