In article ,
Larry Dighera wrote:

On Sat, 19 Feb 2005 18:11:56 GMT, "Steven P. McNicoll"
wrote in
et::


Why do you think he's wacky?


Because his words and actions fit any reasonable definition of wacky.

Given the content of these articles:


http://www.latimes.com/news/nationwo...,3617513.story

For me the most important and most telling questions from the beginning
have been not revolved around whether Churchill was wacky or not, but
rather about what we're to think about the intellectual caliber or
intellectual stature of a field of study -- Ethnic Studies -- in which
someone like Churchill can become not merely a tenured professor but a
department chair?!?

(Not to mention the intellectual standards of a university in which this
can happen . . . )