"T o d d P a t t i s t" wrote in message
...
"Mottley" wrote:

IMHO, it's much harder to detect a digital file faked WR
with a current FR than it was to detect a faked baro and
camera flight that used pictures of real world TP's on the
alleged date of the flight and had an OO signature on the
foil baro trace.


That makes sense.

So, why not require a barograph PLUS a FR for a WR? Wouldn't different
technologies recording the same flight be harder to fake convincingly?
There's lots of perfectly good working barographs laying around.

I've got a like-new Reploggle if anybody wants to buy it.

Bill Daniels