View Single Post
  #10  
Old March 21st 05, 04:02 AM
Matt Barrow
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Bob Noel" wrote in message
...
In article ,
"Matt Barrow" wrote:

Juries determine facts, not law (who is responsible -- this might

not be

Juries don't determine facts. Facts exist or don't.


Hmmm!! As my Dad used to say, "Is that a fact?".


yep


And how do you know they exist or not?


Think about the difference between having commited a crime and
being convicted of a crime in a court of law. Think about how a
jury could actually "determine facts" if some of the evidence is excluded
because it was improperly obtained.


Not an attorney, are 'ya? Or an epistolologist?


Gee, using that logic, why do we bother to investigate? Hell, why do we

go
further and bother to try the case at all?


yeah, that's a logical conclusion to reach...


Yeah, your attempt to spin your dumbass remark is where it leads.


--
Matt
---------------------
Matthew W. Barrow
Site-Fill Homes, LLC.
Montrose, CO