"George Patterson" wrote in message
...


Matt Barrow wrote:

Which (last part there) is entirely correct, or at least for the SC to
determine the Constitutionality.

It is "correct" now purely because Marshall said it. If Jackson had argued
the
issue by legal means (rather than just ignoring the court when it suited
him to
do so), things would have been considerably different. And it is not
limited to
the Supreme Court by any means.

So, if not the SC, what would be the body to make the final determination of
constitutionality?


--
Matt
---------------------
Matthew W. Barrow
Site-Fill Homes, LLC.
Montrose, CO