Thread: ntsb report
View Single Post
  #2  
Old March 30th 05, 03:44 PM
Steven P. McNicoll
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


wrote in message ...

My comment pertains to the pilot actually reaching VFR conditions. His
claim
may not be valid, thus 91.177 becomes pertinent if he were to level off
less
than 1,000 on top or with less than 3 miles flight visibility.


That's not correct either. He was in uncontrolled airspace until he reached
700' AGL and he broke out between 100' and 200' AGL. Had he remained below
700' AGL he's have been in VMC and FAR 91.177 would not apply.