("Mike" wrote)
How would the BBJ have a lower cost?

Spend $40 million to get a $4 billion contract, or spend $10,000 and
get nothing. Spending $40 million makes more money. Therefore,
spending $40 million has a NET lower cost.


Dang it. Corporate Team B has a chartered helicopter waiting to take them
from the airport to Midtown. We're ruined!!

($10,000 in airline tickets x 4,000 units of risk = $40 Million)
($10,000 up to $40 million is a 400,000% increase in spending)

That $40 million spent for the BBJ by the oh-so-close Team A is now just one
more hit against the bottom line.


Montblack
Rommel, you magnificent *******. I read your book.