View Single Post
  #17  
Old April 4th 05, 06:38 PM
M B
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

I recommended that the CH handicaps simply
be squared for Sports class.

The PW-2 with 2.15 becomes 4.62
The Nimbus 3DM with .75 becomes .56

1-26 1.62 2.62
2-33 1.84 3.38
L-13 1.46 2.13
G103 1.15 1.32
ASW20 0.90 0.81

So the Nimbus would need to go 8.2 times faster (or
further or whatever) to beat the PW-2 driver.

This would favor the lower performance ships. Really,
isn't the importance of Sports Class to make it distinct?
I think squaring the handicap would make it much more
insteresting and distinct.

And the PW-2 guy doing a 30km task vs. the Nimbus guy
with
a 250km task sounds like a real race to me!

And a 2-33 vs an ASW-20 SHOULD get about a 4:1 advantage,
instead of a 2:1 advantage.

I'd like to see this scoring at our fun meet coming
up...

As far as the other classes, I'm not sure how the
'standard' class has lived so long. Also, every contest
seems to be a 'seniors' contest anyway, so dunno about
that
one :P

A 2-place contest class? Sports and open-unlimited
should be enough for this.

Finally, who cares about motorglider class? For the
flying portion of the contest, isn't it just the 'fixed
ballast' class?
These guys say 'it's just a glider' so I'd like to
see it just treated that way. I'm aware of the subtlety
of 'landouts' but I
think there is an elegant way to even the playing field
for this
(some penalty for landout, doubled for engine use).

So those are four I'm not so sure about.

Sports, 15 meter, and open-unlimited seem to be the
three
real viable ones. With the squared handicap, lowest
performers
will tend to Sports, the tilters and flappers that
qualify will
go 15-meter, and the sexy big glass in open.

I think every successful multiclass contest has at
least two of these three classes, right? The rest
seem to be very 'specialty' classes. Nothing wrong
with that, except it gets a little harder to get throngs
motivated for so many 'class' competitions

At 17:00 04 April 2005, wrote:

Tim Mara wrote:
we don't need another class...we just need to fix
the one we

have.....

I proposed years ago that we modify the Sports class
'more or less'

to the
very successful European Club Class (they actually
have two versions

there
for standard class gliders and 15 meter gliders called
the 'racing

class)
My (and others) suggestion was to eliminate gliders
from the Sports

class
that already had a 'competitive' class of their own....
Doing this I suggested the sports class would 'disallow'
any 'current


production' competition glider or variation thereof,
from Sports

class
competition.
Meaning..if you have a 'racing' glider that is of
a series currently

being
produced you'd have to fly it in the respective class
it was designed

for
(15M, Standard, open and yes, world class) . If you
have a glider

that has
been surpassed by more competitive models from the
manufacturer,then

it
could be handicapped and allowed into sports class...
The main idea

with
this was to allow closer handicapping and allow older
gliders (lower

cost)
to fly with their pilots competitively and let them
fly in called

tasks
rather than having to design new scoring systems to
meet the broadest

array
of handicaps.
The other change to sports class I suggested was that
no one would be


allowed to fly in a sports class 'National' contest,
that had not
participated in a Sports class regional contest within
the preceding

3
years, thus keeping the class 'pure' .....since it
seems pilots who
otherwise snub their noses at sports class seem to
rush top attend

only when
there is a title at stake....and then of course as
we see it today,

show up
in droves to fly their latest ship...
I never got any flack from these proposals except
of course from

those who
were already fling the latest and greatest ships......but
even most

of them
admitted in the past it would be beneficial to promoting
the sports

class
and would allow owners on lesser budgets with older
gliders a place

to
compete where they could more or less evenly match
themselves and

their
ships and bring more into the sport or glider racing..which
can't be

bad for
any of us...
anyway.my 2c are there again.....
tim

--
Wings & Wheels
www.wingsandwheels.com


Can't argue with any of that, Tim, but where are you
going to draw the
line? The V1's and 20's are still quite potent machines.
How about the
Genesis, its out of production. I do like your proposal
to only allow
real sports pilots to compete, but then it wouldn't
be all that hard to
log a sports regionals every 3 years just to keep ones
options open.
What I see is a lot of local pilots will fly sports
nats when they are
close and the other nationals when they are close.
That's what I do and
kind-a like it that way.

JJ


Mark J. Boyd