wrote in message ...


Matt Barrow wrote:


Their web site is lousy.

It always has been, even back to their first one six, seven years ago.

Just a guess, but I suspect it stems from their borderline paranoia
about
protecting their copyrights.

They really do have issues like that. ;-) A very protective company.
Quite, and so their paranoia is pretty much justified.

But,
they are very good at what they do.

Except the part about having a company web site :~)