The 1956(?) Cessna 175 I once owned had pitot heat, but I can't deny that
you are right. I wonder how many questions posed in the newsgroups would be
answered differently if we took into account the totality of GA history. I
know that there are a lot of CAR 3 airplanes still flying in the GA fleet,
but I have a habit of answering questions based on more recent standards.

Bob

"Bill Zaleski" wrote in message
...
On Fri, 15 Apr 2005 11:13:57 -0700, "Bob Gardner"
wrote:

FAR 23.1323(d) tells manufacturers that if IFR certification is requested,
pitot heat is required. Check your AFM to see if the plane is certificated
for IFR and you have your answer....if it is "yes," the airplane is not
airworthy without it.

Bob Gardner

"Lakeview Bill" wrote in message
. com...
How necessary would it be to have a pitot heater if you are flying
year-round VFR day (only) in the Chicago area?


Many small single engine aircraft are IFR capable and airworthy, but
were never built with pitot heat. The early PA 28-140 and Cessna 175
didn't even have a pitot head, let alone heat. Just an end of an
aluminum tube end pointing forward. Still legal per the original
drawings. CAR 3 certification basis, Bob, not Part 23.