"ChuckSlusarczyk" wrote

Which makes me all the more curious as to why you took me to task on this
thread
and not jaun. jaun evidently approves of zooms tactics because he
constantly
defends him. You say you have no reason to defend zoom but you took the
side of
criticizing the thread. I suspect that you knew if you criticized jaun
you'd be
blasted and called names by him. On the other hand you and I have had a
dialog
that didn't involve name calling and was on a civil level even though we
may
not entirely agree.I'd call that an "open discussion." :-)

See ya

Chuck S RAH-14/1 ret

All good points. There are many, among the movers and shakers in the
aviation industry, that need to know the pitfalls of being zoomed. They
should continue to read and learn, and not ignore the zoom threads.

There are others, like myself, that are not among the movers and shakers
(for now - I might have an ace up my sleeve for a future day ;-)...), that
continue to read, just because.. it's good entertainment, or... or...
whatever!

There are others that care not of zoom, or yaun, and who feel that the zoom
threads are an annoyance to their enjoyment of this newsgroup. They should
use the zoom subject as a kill filter, and read not. That was the reason
for one of my posts in this thread; to tell Stuart to filter, and others,
that feel the need to complain, that don't want to learn and be warned.

Clear enough, everyone? :-)
--
Jim in NC