Ahh My dear Peter,
Even in those primitive circumstances you would in fact be consuming. Just
not to the extent of how modern folks do it. You would have to hunt for
food, cut trees to build your cabin, heat and cook.
It's not bull, but the refusal to see the outright stupidity of someone
complaining about "global warming" while not doing anything to correct it ,
especially by flying airplanes around, is in deed bull.
Just like most problems some must be on the far right or the far left of
an issue, when the answer is usually in the middle somewhere. That was the
point of the post. I prefer the middle myself. I hunt , fish, garden , kayak
down whitewater, and really just enjoy the outdoors. Not to mention flying.
But modern man has to weigh the options. We need oil and other resources,
but we also need this planet. Need that happy middle ground, but we don't
need people who say they are so concerned for this issue while they
themselves are part of the problem.
Living is one thing, our hobbies that pollute is another , wouldn't you
agree? So to preach "global warming" while driving to the airport, to get in
a plane and fly for a few hours, to go home and sit and say somebody needs
to do something about our planet....it's like DUHHHHHHH!

Patrick
student SPL
aicraft structural mech

"Peter Duniho" wrote in message
...

So the only legitimate conservation is to not consume at all?

Bull.