In a previous article, Michael Hofmann said:
Paul Tomblin wrote:
Our local DE won't do checkrides in IMC because he wants to be able to see
the horizon during the unusual attitude recovery.

So he doesn't really believe in scanning and interpreting instruments? Most
remarkable.

I think it's more a case that he believes that some candidates are quite
capable of tumbling the AI before he could recover. I think the PIC
liability issue might also be a factor.


--
Paul Tomblin , not speaking for anybody
Every program has two purposes -- one for which it was written and
another for which it wasn't.