View Single Post
  #3  
Old May 14th 05, 02:44 AM
W P Dixon
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Gatt,
I would highly advise you to do another 10 years of research. Remember all
the northern states that mentioned that term , and the Congressmen who spoke
of it often as a Constitutional right. I believe Webster sumed it up best
(paraphrasing) a union that can be enteres can be left. I do not remember
the exact quote off hand, but that was the heartbeat of it. Be happy to look
it up for you off the group if you care to learn. My library on the subject
can rival most public libraries. Would love to hear where your kin served!

Patrick
student SPL
aircraft structural mech
"gatt" wrote in message
...

"W P Dixon" wrote in message news:hV6he.42

Actually you are not being fair, states had secceded, which at that time

was
Constitutional. What Lincoln did was make a war with a new soveriegn

nation.
You can't really call it a rebellion if it is one country against
another.
Well, you can if you went to public schools!


LOL. "Seceded." *ahem*

I've been researching and writing the civil war for something like ten
years
now. Can't find the part of the Constitution where it says that secession
is legal. Article I, Section 9, of the U.S. Constitution, however,
states
"The privilege of the Writ of Habeus Corpus shall not be suspended, unless
when in Cases of Rebellion or Invasion the public Safety may require it."

Personally, let's just say my ancestors came from Mississippi and
Louisiana
and served on the side that declared it their legal right to secede. But
if
Lincoln determined the impending outbreak of civil war to be a case of
rebellion or invasion, he may have suspended it in the interest of public
safety.

-c