View Single Post
  #153  
Old May 25th 05, 12:54 AM
Matt Barrow
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Michael 182" wrote in message
...

"Matt Barrow" wrote in message
...

"Michael 182" wrote in message
...


Do you think they'll invest the time and effort in a case such as

this?

If they (the pilot and his attorney) do they will probably hire an

expert
"consultant".


I was thinking of the feds.

I can't think of any reason the feds would try and investigate the
computers, nor any particular reason to try and refute an expert's

findings.
They have plenty of ammunition to make their case without attacking a
forensic study.


Sigh....

Schaeffer (?) and the lawyer were expecting their claim of having checked
the information via the internet and using non-recorded use history would
cover his ass from a charge of negligence. They expected this claim to
"fly" (sorry), and expected that the feds would not tear apart Schaeffers PC
(if they even considered THAT possibility).

Like I'd said earlier; it's akin to "the check was mailed two weeks ago, but
I didn't send it registered mail".