"Michael 182" wrote in message
...

"Matt Barrow" wrote in message
...

"Michael 182" wrote in message
...

"Matt Barrow" wrote in message
...

"Michael 182" wrote in
message
...

Do you think they'll invest the time and effort in a case such as
this?

If they (the pilot and his attorney) do they will probably hire an
expert
"consultant".

I was thinking of the feds.

I can't think of any reason the feds would try and investigate the
computers, nor any particular reason to try and refute an expert's
findings.
They have plenty of ammunition to make their case without attacking a
forensic study.

Sigh....

Schaeffer (?) and the lawyer were expecting their claim of having
checked
the information via the internet and using non-recorded use history
would
cover his ass from a charge of negligence. They expected this claim to
"fly" (sorry), and expected that the feds would not tear apart
Schaeffers
PC
(if they even considered THAT possibility).

Like I'd said earlier; it's akin to "the check was mailed two weeks ago,
but
I didn't send it registered mail".

That's possible, but if that is part of defense's strategy he needs a new
lawyer. I don't believe the attorney thinks for a minute that, in the
absence of proof, the FAA will be the least bit impressed by the claim to
have used the internet to get any form of briefing.

For a criminal charge, probably they won't; to deflect a negligence action
though...