View Single Post
  #56  
Old May 29th 05, 06:26 AM
Antoņio
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default



Gary Drescher wrote:

I think what Anto=F1io was asking for was a regulation to support the not=

ion
that a pilot can or must refuse an ATC instruction just because compliance
would violate the FARs. That is, what regulation says that other
regulations take precedence over 91.123b (which requires compliance with =

ATC
instructions, except if there's an emergency need to deviate)? As far as I
can tell, there's no such regulation (although AIM 4-4-1a,b and 4-4-6c are
at least tangentially relevant).

--Gary


Exactly. However, AIM 3-2-1d is somewhat disquieting...

"d.VFR requirements. It is the responsibility of the pilot to insure
that ATC clearance or radio communication requirements are met prior to
entry into class B, Class C, or Class D airspace. The pilot retains
this responsibility when receiving ATC radar advisories. (See 14 CFR
Part 91)"

Antonio