"Bob Moore" wrote in message
. 122...
"Jay Honeck" wrote

Thanks for the information, Dave. I hope you don't think that I'm an
EAA detractor, because I'm not. In fact, I can't figure out how or
why some people are so down on an organization that has done so much
for GA,

Because I don't see that as the function of the EAA. I first joined
back in 1964 because it was a "club" of, by, and for homebuilders.
Paul then took it off on a "warbird" kick and then along came Tom
who saw it as a money making operation.

WE have the AOPA to promote General Aviation.

What is wrong with multiple organizations promoting GA? The more the
merrier in my book

It is true EAA started as a home builder organization. That was in the days
of owner designed or plans built aircraft. Those days are for all practical
purposes gone. 1964 was a long, long time ago. With the current quick
build kits, excellent manufacturer support and the internet the original
purpose of EAA is no longer needed. Have you noticed you need to look very
hard to find the name Experimental Aircraft Association. Had EAA stayed
their original course they would have expired long ago. In most chapters
homebuilders are a small minority.

As far as money making, you either do or you go away. Money is good. Very,
very, very good!

Largest current contingent within EAA is antique, vintage and classic.

Bob Moore