"Matt Barrow" wrote in message
...
"Roy Smith" wrote in message
...
"Matt Barrow" wrote:
Unfortunately not...and there are a lot of "humor challenged" AS WELL
as
those that think if it's not on SNOPES it must be true.
Would you put more faith in it if I could find a Wikipedia article on
the
subject? :-)
Well, first of all, if you did provide such EVIDENCE (_real_ evidence, not
flatulent opinions ..especially opinions using selective data), I'd no
longer have to take it on "faith", right. So right there your credibility
is
a bit stunted as you don't apparently comprehend what constitutes a proper
epistemology or method.
Secondly, I've seen stuff on Wikipedia (an open encyclopedia) that was
dubious. Noam Chomsky comes to mind.
Thirdly, well, I guess you are just an example of the former. :~)
Addendum:
You still haven't addressed that many Urban Legends are lame attempts at
humor.
|