"xyzzy" wrote in message
...
Matt Barrow wrote:

"Roy Smith" wrote in message
...

"Matt Barrow" wrote:

Unfortunately not...and there are a lot of "humor challenged" AS WELL
as
those that think if it's not on SNOPES it must be true.

Would you put more faith in it if I could find a Wikipedia article on
the
subject? :-)


Well, first of all, if you did provide such EVIDENCE (_real_ evidence,
not
flatulent opinions ..especially opinions using selective data), I'd no
longer have to take it on "faith", right. So right there your
credibility is
a bit stunted as you don't apparently comprehend what constitutes a
proper
epistemology or method.

Secondly, I've seen stuff on Wikipedia (an open encyclopedia) that was
dubious. Noam Chomsky comes to mind.

Thirdly, well, I guess you are just an example of the former. :~)


I think what Matt is trying to say in so many words is that for him to
believe it, you'll have to get Rush Limbaugh to say it.


I think you are a pompous ass and totally full of ****. Based on this last,
it's proven AFAIC.

AMF.

[plonk]