"O. Sami Saydjari" wrote in message
...
This is actually a split off from the "Rotating Injectors Among
Cylinders" thread. I prefer not to distract that thread any.

I must say that I find the evidence presented in support on LOP to be
uncompelling.


The exiting data is not only compelling, it's pretty much overwhelming.

Although it is certainly appealing at the gut level, it
is a far cry from scientific evidence that LOP operations is better for
the engine and will lead to longer TBOs.

You need to learn to integrate information.

But why would anyone want to kick in a load of $$$ when Old Wives Tales are
so "compelling". Not only is there no known data to support these OWT's, by
the time people finally quit sitting on their brains and assimilate the new
learning, we'll probably be using mico-nuclear engines.

From geocentric, flat earth, and a host of other "knowledge bases", I guess
ROP/LOP is just another notch in human nature.

I suspect what's wanted here is not scientifc data, but excuses.


--
Matt
---------------------
Matthew W. Barrow
Site-Fill Homes, LLC.
Montrose, CO