View Single Post
  #77  
Old July 19th 05, 08:20 AM
Happy Dog
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Dave Stadt" wrote in message
"Dudley Henriques" dhenriques@noware .net wrote in


A Stearman with a 220 mill hanging on the nose is indeed a heavy steed

to
be
handling at low altitude acrobatically, but if flown correctly, an

energy
management acro program in a Stearman is not all that hard to fly. You
simply compensate for the lack of power by trading off the energy
equation
between airspeed and g. Generally it's a loose program, but it's not

that difficult to fly.

Dudley Henriques

We all have our opinions and I don't see any comparison between the two
extremes. One extreme shows piloting skill and the other makes lotsa
noise and impresses the general public.


Wrong. Your opinion is not based on the facts. Do you have any evidence

to back your claim?

I suggest you look up 'opinion' before you spout.


Get stuffed. My English comprehension is just fine. Your opinion is
incorrect. This has been explained to you by experts in the field you are
attempting to pass judgement on with your opinions. You should be thankful
for the free education you've been receiving here. But you aren't. So
let's see if you're educable. Learn what's involved in the low level pass
Tucker does that looks a bit like a knife edge. Assess the diffficulty and
get back to us.

That's what they do for a living which is
fine but it doesn't mean I have to like it or be impressed by it.


Or understand it. Which you don't. That you dislike it is irrelevant.


It is very relevent to me


Nobody cares. Get used to it.

and others with the same opinion, of which there
are many by the way.


No paucity of uneducated opinions.

moo