"Happy Dog" wrote in message
.. .
"Gig 601XL Builder" wr.giacona@coxDOTnet wrote in message
news:qtsDe.40436$DC2.8316@okepread01...

"Margy" wrote in message
...
Did you READ the report. It was 7% not 76% percent 124 out of 1683. The
rate varied by year from 4% to 9%. Now I would argue that 1% is still
too high, but I know perfection isn't going to ever happen.


Margy, the 76% number came from a VERY quick Google of "Aircraft
accidents alcohol" from I beleive Redwood City PD. I said at the time I
took that number with a grain of salt.

It's so absurd that your excuse isn't credible. You were just trying to
make a case using whatever info you could find.

OK dog boy. I clearly in the post where I mentioned the 76% number said
where it was from and that it should be taken with a grain of salt. I have
yet to see any data from you that disproved that those who have been through
rehab are equal or less likely to be have an aircraft accident.

And guess what I don't have to prove my case the FAA is doing exactly what I
would do so if you think their policy on post rehab flying should be changed
you are going to have to come up with the data to sway them. Have fun.