Peter Duniho wrote:

"gregg" wrote in message
...
Except that you also used the word "insane" when referring to people's
responses to a cracked up plane.

I used the word with exactly the same definition as that used by the post
to
which I replied. If you have a complaint about the usage, direct your
complaint to the person who originally used the word.

What this has to do with the definition of "irrational" is beyond me.

Pete


Here is exactly what you said:

On Mon, 18 Jul 2005 at 12:00:02 in message
, Peter Duniho
wrote:
What's insane is thinking that it's for some reason important to preserve
these planes. As I already pointed out, if they were so important to
preserve, we shouldn't have been building them to be destroyed in the first
place.

Those are your words no one elses. YOU said it was insane to think it's
important to save those planes.

Don't blame someone else for a word you chose to use.

What it has to do with irrational is that you used both to describe your
viewpoint of the same phenomenon. Above, you said it was insane. Other
places you said it's irrational.

--
Saville

Replicas of 15th-19th century nautical navigational instruments:

http://home.comcast.net/~saville/backstaffhome.html

Restoration of my 82 year old Herreshoff S-Boat sailboat:

http://home.comcast.net/~saville/SBOATrestore.htm

Steambending FAQ with photos:

http://home.comcast.net/~saville/Steambend.htm