David Kinsell wrote:

The Cambridge models 10, 20, and 25 have no capability of producing
a valid IGC file....

Kinda kills the idea of IGC being a universal,
secure format, doesn't it?

You lost me there, DK.

If these Cambridge files are not valid IGC files, how is their lack of
security and universality of any relevance to the discussion of (valid) IGC
files' security and universality?


Jack