Earlier, Rich S. wrote:

Sorry I even brought it up.

Don't be - there's potential for some interesting discussion on the
topic.

I definitely agree that classifying aircraft as plans- or kit-built has
value in the context of judging them for craftsmanship awards.
Obviously, making all the parts is a greater achievement than just
assembling them. And sure as heck it's a much greater achievement than
just writing the checks.

What I wonder is how plans-built status is (or should be) validated.
With photos? Signed affadavits?

Hmmm... DNA samples... CSI Oshkosh...

Bob K.