We are all gentlemen here. One thing gentlemen do is to agree to disagree
agreeably.
Allow me to cover a couple of points here. First, I have respect for JJ.
I've spent
time on the phone with him and honestly believe that he WANTS us to be
safer. His
motivations are pure and he only wants us all to live to a great old age and
share a beer
together. Second, I recognise the pain of losing GOOD people of immense
talent.
JJ jumped in because he saw ANOTHER guy lost in a process he feels needs
changing.
I can see merit in his proposal. JJ's message seems to lack tact, given the
outspoken response
his words have recieved....... But we are gentlemen, and we do need to
disagree agreeably.
JJ has a point that needs to be listened too, now isn't a good time for
those very close to the
incident. I would hope that everybody takes a step away from the keyboard
and ask one
question. Can we make Neils legacy one that extends beyond his art, and
after we all
grieve a bit, can we work to prevent this from happening again. I for one
am certian
he would wholeheartedly agree........................
Thanks for reading this
Scott.