"BlueSkyzz" wrote in message
...
Matt Barrow wrote:

"BlueSkyzz" wrote in message
...

john smith wrote:


You get rid of one, and another pops up!

http://www.ainonline.com/issues/08_0...senate_03.html

Please keep your politics out of this newsgroup - this is
rec.aviation.piloting,


PILOTING!!!

How would this,

"A Senate amendment that called for severe fines, loss of license and
aircraft confiscation for violating the flight restricted zone (FRZ) in
the
Washington air defense identification zone was stripped from the
Department
of Homeland Security appropriations bill last month."

...be off topic?

Never said it was off-topic, learn to read for comprehension.

Try writing coherently.

My
complaint was with the political insinuations raised by the OP.

Calling it Hillary's amendment is political insinuation?

LOL! Guess you'll really enjoy paying $3, $4, ($5?) for gas, won't you?
And you're obviously too blind to see the connections to the current
regime. Ah well, ignorance is bliss... :-)

Speaking of comprehension, try keeping to the topic which is a proposed risk
assessment study.

You've got a wrap on ignorance: Gore, Kerry and Hillary all have said we
should be paying $5 a gallon for gas. Gore, largely, even campaigned on it,
wrote a book on it...

Try removing your head from your anal cavity and I see some big time
Freudian projection coming from your end.