Philip S. wrote:
in article , Matt Whiting at
wrote on 9/2/05 3:29 AM:


Philip S. wrote:

Terrorist attack or natural disaster, it really makes no difference--the
current administration ran for re-election less than a year ago on the
premise that they could keep us all safe, that they were better than their
opponents on issues of "homeland security", that when it came to protecting
the homeland, only they could do the job.

How do you propose that the Feds stop a hurricane? Put up a tall fence?
Protecting the homeland from a hurricane. That is hilarious...

Matt


Um, are you deliberately misrepresenting what I said, or do you just not
know how to read? I clearly was referring to the response to the disaster,
not the disaster itself. But feel free to erect as many strawmen as
possible.

No, simply pointing out that what you wrote was ludicrous. Maybe you
didn't write what you intended, but above you clearly say that
"terrorist attack or natural disaster, it really makes no difference"
and then you say the Bush administration ran for re-election on the
premise that they could keep us all safe from either of the above. And
then you say that they should have protected the homeland. So you are
clearly saying that they should have been able to protect the homeland
from EITHER a terrorist attack or a natural disaster. They have clearly
done the former and they can't possibly do the latter so your assertion
is hilarious as I stated.


Matt