Had an Archer II (similar to the 180) and really liked it.

FWIW:
I like the 180hp, less would not be enough for me.
Low wing is better vis. for some things (like base to final) and easier to
fuel.
Low wings are worse for taking Photos. Let's not get into that now.

One door ingress & egress on the Archer is a problem for some.

--

Thx, {|;-)

Victor J. (Jim) Osborne, Jr.
"Joe" wrote in message
ups.com...
Wanted to ask the group for their pro's/cons between the Cessna Skyhawk
and Piper Archer 180.

1) What particular year models are more desired than others

2) Which one is easier to re-sell, and which one has more profit
potential?

3) Easier to maintain?

4) Etc, etc

thanks