Doug Carter wrote:
On 2005-09-17, RST Engineering wrote:

Jay, goddammit, you don't have ONE defender in this ng for your actions.

Probably has a lot more than ONE.

Perhaps, but let's see what they're agreeing with.

Jay started out by stating that sticking a wing into a puffy cloud (apparently
cumulus) the size of a semi while flying VFR at an altitude reserved for IFR
traffic is not a violation of the FARs. Anyone agree with that?

Jay then stated that, since clouds aren't defined, he can make up his own
definition. Anyone agree with that?

When presented with a dictionary definition, Jay argued that, since it wasn't
precise enough to suit him, he should be allowed to make up his own definition.
Anyone agree with that?

George Patterson
Give a person a fish and you feed him for a day; teach a person to
use the Internet and he won't bother you for weeks.