"Barry" wrote in message
hlink.net...

Among the cases Scott chronicled is the case of a 135 pilot who launched
in an area of AIRMET forecast icing, did NOT experience icing, but the FAA
still successfully prosecuted a case against him for flying in 'known
Icing.' After you have read the article series, your whole opinion will
change about the legality of and the risks associated with launching into,
and flying at or near the freezing level in such an area.


The subject line refers to Part 91 operations, not Part 135.



There doesn't have to be an FAR specifically addressing flight of a
non-icing certificated bug-smasher into known icing conditions. FAR 91.13
takes care of that.


Only when the life or property of another is endangered.