Jay,

It looks like this thread is degrading. Get out while you can and save
yourself some stress and keystrokes. If you have not convinced any
of the folks who disagree with you by now, you probably won't.

Where do I stand on this issue? I DON'T. I have my own opinions but
don't think it is worth the effort to post them since my opinions are
not fully-formed.

Btw, your original post was really cool and I loved reading it! Please
continue to share your experiences. I liked your "Therapy" post, too.
I can't wait to take my 1 year-old flying, but am stifled by my "Nervous
Nellie" of a wife who won't let me fly my son until she is comfortable
with flying. Anyhow, that's another discussion for another thread on
another day. Please keep writing on how your kids do and don't like
flying. Also, please share how you introduced your family to flying.
You may email me privately if you want at flying (-a-t-) K7SLE-dot-com.

Thanks,

Chris G.



Jay Honeck wrote:
Give me a friggin' break. The scenario you described in your post is
ridiculous. It would be MUCH preferable to violate the cruising altitude
regulation, than to violate the cloud clearances regulation. But
regardless, guess what? Sometimes, you cannot meet the VFR visibility or
cloud clearances requirements.


Did you bother to actually *read* anything I wrote?

Apparently not. Why this continues to surprise me, I surely don't know...