View Single Post
  #6  
Old September 23rd 05, 10:20 PM
Tim Newport-Peace
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

X-no-archive: yes
In article .com,
ContestID67 writes
In the "IGC File Name Decoding Made Easy" it was mentioned about the EW
Avionics recorders (and other recorders) which take a long base10
serial number and convert it to base36 (0-9, a-z) to fit in the file
name format.

"Cambridge, Garrecht (Volkslogger), Zander all use the external serial.
Filser,LX,Colibri,PrintTechnik convert external serial directly to
base36" - Peter Wyld

Peter also comments that depending on the Model of EW recorder, they
take the serial number on the case and add 2000 (B models) or 9000(D
models). A models stay the same. Whew.


What about the Model C? I don't think there were many of these, but I
believe there were some.


From a post by Martin Gregorie I see the following example for an EW

model D

The A line from a trace: AEWAD0430 99429850
The serial number on the case: D0430
The serial number in a filename: 79Y

Taking D0430 and adding 9000 per Peter Wyld's post, I get a base10
serial number of 9430.

Taking 79Y and converting it to Base10.

79Y = 7x36x36 + 9x36 + 34 = 9430. Hey, it works.

All I need now is to get Excel to do the math in reverse and deal with
the add 2000 or 9000 to the SN. I'll report back.

Enjoy, John
johnatderosaweb.com

The problem with deciding to decode Base-36 or Base-10 according to the
manufacturer code is that while a specific manufacturer may use Base-10
now, any future recorder models will not get approval for Base 10 serial
numbers, they will need to use Base-36.

For instance, Legacy Cambridge models use base-10, but 302 uses base-36.

I would therefore urge you to display both the Base-36 and the Base-10
serial numbers as it is not possible to determine the model from the
filename (if you ignore EW).

Tim Newport-Peace

"Indecision is the Key to Flexibility."